Wow. That was a cool play to read, and I'm not usually one to enjoy that kind of thing.
I want to talk about trees. More specifically, I wanna talk about the downed tree in the Keller's yard. There are sooooo many things that it could and very well may be.
My initial thought after finishing the play was that the tree was probably put there to symbolize Larry's memory. It's so obvious. The one random night Ann, Larry's woman, arrives the tree snaps. The immediate day after that, all this dramatic crap happens, ending with towels and thorough carpet cleanings.
Seeing as Ann's arrival oh-so-subtly coincides with the dead tree, I think it's safe for me to say that the bad event of the tree is meant to contrast with Ann and Chris' engagement. Kind of like one thing dies, but something else is born. Like that.
Or, maybe the dead tree is supposed to symbolize Joe's imminent downfall, like a bad omen. It's no coincidence that Joe has kept his cover for years, and then it's compromised the day after Larry's tree snapped.
There's a lot there to compare with. I'm curious as to what everyone else made of the tree initially, before thinking about it.
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Friday, March 13, 2009
I really can't decide about Father Flynn
There are so many places in the play where his actions could be taken as both a sign of guilt or frustration. The first example I thought about was in the scene where Sister Aloyisius had her final confrontation with Father Flynn. Up until this scene I had no reason to believe he was guilty of anything save for maybe a bad temper. But then Father Flynn starts begging with Sister Aloysius to not report him. Just this alone was enough to give me a little bit of doubt to Father Flynn's credibility.
The scene we talked about on Wednesday was probably the first example of John Patrick Shanley trying to give the reader or the audience second thoughts about the truth. The thing is, he does it enough to give you a double take of the situation, but not enough for you to necessarily take it as credible evidence. Personally, I didn't pick up on it until the idea was raised in class. I took it as him really not wanting to report Donald Muller and get him kicked out of Altar Boys.
Another I thought of was his solo confrontation with Sister James. Could it be he's trying to really plea with her to see the truth? Or, is it that he's playing on her need for simplicity? I'm not sure. It could reasonably taken either way. There's just no logical, evidence-based way to judge him given the information we're given.
The latest one I've come up with is also during the initial confrontation between Sister James, Sister Aloyisius and Father Flynn. Near the end of the scene, Father Flynn threatens to ensure Sister Aloysius a forced leave of absence. Again it could be taken two ways. Either Father Flynn feels wronged and thinks she should be at least be scolded by one the higher-ups, or he feels she is a threat to his secrecy and wants to get her out of the picture. I'm so confused!
Is there really any clear evidence to either find innocence or guilt in the situation?
The scene we talked about on Wednesday was probably the first example of John Patrick Shanley trying to give the reader or the audience second thoughts about the truth. The thing is, he does it enough to give you a double take of the situation, but not enough for you to necessarily take it as credible evidence. Personally, I didn't pick up on it until the idea was raised in class. I took it as him really not wanting to report Donald Muller and get him kicked out of Altar Boys.
Another I thought of was his solo confrontation with Sister James. Could it be he's trying to really plea with her to see the truth? Or, is it that he's playing on her need for simplicity? I'm not sure. It could reasonably taken either way. There's just no logical, evidence-based way to judge him given the information we're given.
The latest one I've come up with is also during the initial confrontation between Sister James, Sister Aloyisius and Father Flynn. Near the end of the scene, Father Flynn threatens to ensure Sister Aloysius a forced leave of absence. Again it could be taken two ways. Either Father Flynn feels wronged and thinks she should be at least be scolded by one the higher-ups, or he feels she is a threat to his secrecy and wants to get her out of the picture. I'm so confused!
Is there really any clear evidence to either find innocence or guilt in the situation?
Friday, February 27, 2009
My thoughts on "Joe Turner's Come and gone"
I'm not sure about anyone else, but I thought this play was super suspenseful. From the Juba scene on I really wanted to know what happened to Loomis.
There was something I wanted to bring up. Wasn't there a character in one of the Harry Potter book's? I'm pretty sure he was a Professor and a bit on the mysterious side if I recall. He may have been black as well, but that I'm not positive on. I'm thinking J.K. Rowling may be a fan of August Wilsom. What do you guys think?
There was something I wanted to bring up. Wasn't there a character in one of the Harry Potter book's? I'm pretty sure he was a Professor and a bit on the mysterious side if I recall. He may have been black as well, but that I'm not positive on. I'm thinking J.K. Rowling may be a fan of August Wilsom. What do you guys think?
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Forgot to post the video....
I couldn't find the clip of the scene, but here's the trailer. The majority of the movie is Liam Neeson going undercover to sabotage someone and get his daughter back. It reminded me of Salieri.
Cool. That was different.
I liked "Spinning Into Butter" a lot. It was something different to read and it had a theme that I don't come across all that often. There were some "Oh, no she didn't!" moments during the racist monologue that made me snicker in disbelief. I know this isn't much of an original opinion, but I thought the higher-ups were douche-bags. They were trying to be un-racist but were subconciously making it worse. They picked a good setting too. Vermont is a little on the racist side, and in the same way too. Good play overall, though. I did find it a little messed up that Simon did all that to himself for attention(that's how I took it). Anyway, Vermonters should have this play programmed into their heads. Or maybe they shouldn't. I'm not sure.
Amadeus was...meh...
I didn't really care too much for Amadeus. Having Mozart's character be as immature and stupid as he was made the play feel a little less attention-grabbing. I think it took me a couple sessions to get through the play because I just was losing focus and couldn't care less about any of the characters. I guess that's not completely true. I liked Salieri. He reminds me of the dad in that new movie, Taken(which I suggest everyone see) when he "sabotaged" Mozart from the inside; kind of like a double agent. I'll post the scene I mentioned from the movie below.
I also kind of thought the Venticelli's weren't that useful. I would think the movie could identify the "rumor" element just as well without them. I didn't like the story, most of the characters, and I didn't have much better to say about the movie. To me, it seemed like it wasn't worth reading.
I also kind of thought the Venticelli's weren't that useful. I would think the movie could identify the "rumor" element just as well without them. I didn't like the story, most of the characters, and I didn't have much better to say about the movie. To me, it seemed like it wasn't worth reading.
Tuesday, February 3, 2009
Art Wasn't All That Bad...
I mean I haven't read that many plays before so I don't have much of a standard, but I thought Art was pretty good. I'm usually not much for reading, but I enjoyed reading this. Yvan was probably the character I could relate the most to. That, and I think he was the primary source of humor. Don't get me wrong, Marc and Serge were pretty funny as well, but Yvan stood out to me for some reason. It could be the fact that I suppose he could be considered the main character. Being the neutral party, pointing him out as the main character would feel less one-sided, at least to me. All in all though, Art was enjoyable. I could silently read the lines and picture how an actor would say it. Pretty enjoyable.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)